Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Philip S Rosemond's avatar

I think the idea of Free Will is deceptive. How are we free? Are we free to do as we will? Maybe,but only within the confines of our own minds and bodies. And then, we may not have the resources to exercise that freedom, as we may not have the money, the health or the ability to expand beyond that freedom. We may believe we can kibbitz with God. But, dang! Why didn't he talk with me? I asked my boss for a raise so I could take some time off to go to Europe for a month, and what did that SOB do instead?! He fired me!

If free will is absolute, from the mathematicians point of view, all past present and future occurrences could be predicted with accuracy by obscenely complex mathematics, traditional physics and now quantum computing. So are we really that free? I am not qualified to speak to that, but I will comment on the word “free."

Here in the US we cherish this word “Free” and “Freedom.” So much so that I think the biggest mistake is that we believe are free to do and be whatever we wish, regardless of harm to others. We get greedy for that freedom. We become avaricious, desirous and coveting then take what we want, creating what we want no matter how dangerous or helpful, forgetting the needs of others, ignoring the idea of moderation, ignoring self discipline, but mostly ignoring responsibility that freedom demands. The result is American society has slowly degraded into a hierarchical culture of gross excess. (I think we forget all the empires and similar hegemonies that have collapsed under the weight of its own ignorance and liberties taken at the expense of others.)

Sure, some religions maintain doctrinal beliefs in free will such granted by God in Judeo Islamic Christian ideologies. But even in these cases, if mankind subverts and supercedes "God’s will,” they will suffer the consequences. This is specific to many faith based beliefs. However there is some pragmatic and provable truth to them. It is based upon the simple truth behind the same “Reap what you sew” found in Biblical Galatians: In science and logic it's called cause and effect.

If we choose (as in “will”), to act, the activity will likely have a resultant circumstance. I think the best way to temper this to a more affimative result is to expand ones “will” beyond the “self.” I do not think it is enriely about renouncing oneself. But it is about considering others with or beyond oneself. In theistic religions the practice of prayer for others can help. In Vedic religions, there are hundreds of meditations one can practice. But, there is little doubt that the best way to understand what is “free” about will -and what isn’t free- is to cultivate awareness. The afforementioned practices certainly are foundational to this. But, all the prayer meditations and contemplations in the world won’t keep a tobacco addict wth cancer with smoking just one more cigarette.

We have to take resonsibility for our actions, with both ease and enjoyment fo what we do, while knowing what we shouldn’t do. The idea of the middle way, not too tight, not too loose applies. As the title of Chogyam Trungpa’s books accurately pronounces, we a "Myth of Freedom.” to despell the myth so we understand what freeome means to us as individuals, we first have to consider others and eh rest of the world before we act.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?